Then the robbers successfully brought a lot of cash after raping some
hot chicks and get away with it with the public blaming the victim as
usual. After all, who knows that the victim may have done something
wrong. Maybe the victim look at the wrong direction and hence provoke
the just robber to slaughter victims.

Well, that’s what usually happens. Not this time though.

Shannon Edmonds shot the 2 kids in the back when they’re fleeing.

In rare surprising case, the DA did what seems to be the right thing.
The DA charged Renato Hughes, the robber, with murder. When some
vermin choose to rob people’s house, it’s naturally liable for all the
risk that happen because of the robbery. Edmond didn’t choose to get
rob. The robber chose to rob him. For once, it’s kind of cool that
even a government can figure out that it’s the robber’s fault. Not
porn movie fault. Not the media. Not Hollywood. Not video games.

When people rob, killing robbers would help putting robbers population
under control. Hell, even government got things right once in a while
when the good guys show them who’s tough.

In many countries, religious thugs can come from house to house
violating the owners’ right to (even legally) watch porn and sell
liquor. In UK, we got good guys go to jail just for defending the
little right he still have from two vermins that want to rob him.

In US no… Thanks to people like Edmon. This is really a country of
the (relatively) brave. If we have more people like Edmon, it’ll be
even braver.

When thieves victim die and die, people would expect that it’s okay to
steal. That perhaps the productive should share more money to robbers.
Perhaps the victims should have been “nicer”. They would think that
it’s morally okay to steal. However, people like Edmonds reverse this
trend.

With more brave people like Edmon, one day, it’ll be legal to pursue
thieves and slaughter their whole family if that’s what it takes to
retrieve stolen properties when thieves fail to honor property right
by returning stolen properties.

It’ll be a positive feedback. There will be less thieves. That means
less vote for thieves’ right and more vote for property right. More
and more self defense will be legal. Then, there will be less thieves.
Then properties will be saver.

Sweet….

That’s what should happen to all robbers. That’s what all productive
people should do in this world when it’s legal: Kill vermins and
parasites that get on their way, like Edmond. Vermins want to play
tough, we should play tougher. Promote death penalty. Kill burglars,
and robbers, protect properties.

The more we kill them the saver our property, which is the sole
purpose why we need government, killing thieves and robbers to protect
our property.

Please consult your lawyers about your right to kill vermins…
Killing vermins illegally can be very politically costly. Keeping it
legal will cut down political cost. The lesser the cost, the more we
can buy.

Also not simply because it’s just means it’s legal. There are idiot DA
and cops in the world that would give problems to self defender even
on clear cut case. However, working too hard to keep it legal, like
waiting till they hit or shoot first, can get you killed, which is a
very high cost.

So do it legally. I don’t want to cause good people to go to jail (or
die) for the only important social value the world need, protection of
properties and killing vermins that get in the way of that. Fuck
eradicating poverty, environmentalist, public school. There is only
one social value worthy for everyone and that’s killing vermins to
protect the wealth of the productive. The market will take care the
rest. Believing otherwise means practicing envy bigotry. When
government ain’t doin that, the world is already gun zone.

What do you think?

Hopefully more vermins die that way. Kudo for Shannon Edmonds. Way to
go. That’s model citizen. That’s how life work. That’s the way things
work as there are still people opposing free market, kill or be
killed. Edmond do the right thing, he choose not to be killed.

Hip hip huraaaaaahhhh…

NB: As of this writing there is a doubt whether this is a real robbery
or just some drug deals gone bad. The home owners deal drugs (a crime
as victimless as killing vermins). However, the shot robbers have
robbery convictions. Also they never denied of beating up Edmon’s step
son to the point of causing brain damage. If mistakes are made to
prosecute the surviving robber, it’s most likely not a big one. Some
of the activities that described here may not be legal. Please consult
your lawyer before killing anyone (long before any possible encounter,
of course).
NB: Check http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/holocaust/hol-pix/einsatz1.jpg
to see what would happen to your whole family if you count on
government to protect you. Recently a US state attorney general
prioritize prosecuting porn rather than thieves, burglars, and
robbers. Think about it. If they think porn watchers are more
dangerous than thieves, what are the chance that one day they’ll
presume that blacks, jews, muslims, christians, you, him, her, meat
eaters, vegan, deserve elimination? Want to live? Count on your own

KARACHI: In a shocking incident of vigilante justice, a mob in Karachi on Wednesday burnt three bandits alive near the Timber Market, venting their anger and disgust over the rising crimes.

The gory incident took place when four robbers barged into Akbar Soomro’s apartment on the third floor in the Somiya Mukarram Palace, situated near the Timber Market. The robbers barged into his house at around 1:30 pm and held the children hostage at gunpoint. They cut the telephone line and electricity wires and locked the house from inside and started misbehaving with the women.

The bandits looted cash and jewellery. When they were about to flee, the door bell rang. When the bandits opened the door, they found Akbar, the head of the family. They shot and injured him and started fleeing.

Akbar, a seaman by profession, chased the bandits and made a hue and cry. The passers-by and residents of the area caught the three bandits and started beating them, while the fourth escaped. They immediately shifted Akbar to a hospital where he was declared out of danger.

In the meantime, 800 to 1,000 people gathered at the scene and started beating the robbers with fists, blows and sticks. Some people brought kerosene and petrol and sprinkled it over the bandits and the mob torched them. Some people resorted to aerial firing and also shot and injured the bandits before they were killed.

A large contingent of police tried to rescue the bandits but the public resisted and pushed the police back. Edhi workers who tried to save the bandits who were aflame were also beaten by the public. After a tough struggle of 20 minutes, the police managed to shift one injured bandit to hospital, while two bandits who were completely burnt died on the spot. The third bandit died in the hospital after struggling for life for two hours.

The residents said they were happy over the incident and praised the persons who had torched these robbers alive. The robbers, they said, looted the area people and had been killing them for just a cell-phone or cash. They added due to this, they had instructed their children not to resist and surrender cell-phones to the robbers. They said what the people achieved was justice because had the bandits been arrested, they would have been granted bail by the courts and would have resumed looting.

According to the residents, bandits regularly robbed the passers-by on Nishtar Road late at night and deprived the poor vendors of their day’s earnings. Station House Officer, Eidgah, Nasir Mehmood, said the bandits were unidentified and their bodies were shifted to the morgue. He added that they had found two TT pistols from the bandits and jewellery and Rs 20,000 looted from Akbar’s house.

The SHO said two FIRs were lodged – one by Akbar Soomro and the other on behalf of the state under the Arms Ordinance for the pistols recovered from the bandits.

Is Katherine Trimble an envy racist bigot?

A person, mistakenly think that she’s in his friend list. However,
rather than denying it, she’ll simply give a friendly reply.

>Hi Friends’ name]

>Many thanks for your message.

>Remind me what *** is again?

>There are some networks that I simply don’t bother with anymore.

>Best wishes

>Katherine

Such mutual communication automatically make each person in the friend
list of another in a social networking site.

Not suspicious of any problem, the person then build his business
network in a friendly manner to many of those in his list, which
unfortunately include the old hag.

Soon, the beldam is engaged in serious slandering campaign the person.
She claimed that never communicated at all with the person, which is
false. She claimed that the person is spamming, the claim that does not
match the official rule. She also claimed that the person is pretending
to be her friend to get her friends.

The accusation is absurd. Who the hell does she think she is that
anyone would pretend to be her friend? What makes her so arrogant?

What sort of idiot cannot tell a different between someone trying to be
friendly to many people and someone trying to fraudulently get extra
credibility by pretending to be someone’s friend?

Thinking this is just a friendly misunderstanding, the person simply
explained to Katherine:

>I don’t mind your comments about me as long as it is true. So keep in mind that we did chat in a friendly way and we were indeed in
>each other network, which you can check, before saying anything about me. Also, *******’s definition of spamming is trying to sell
>something without intent to network which is far from what I do.
>I’ll try to get both of us disconnected. …you could have understood and tell me privately like Peter did. Then we could have really been
>friend. It’s a tragedy, but I got 400+ other friends to concentrate on.

The beldam didn’t stop. She got even madder.

She kept making many false claims. She claimed that the person is a
robot with no public information. She said that she had never
communicated in any way to the person. She tried to portray that the
person has some fraudulent intent, friendless, and that nobody trust
the person. She claimed that the person is a nazi.

All these are over a few friendly gestures to her friends.

Now, put your self in the persons’ shoe. What can he do to make her
leave him alone?

Expert analysis suggests racism as her real motives. The person is
Asian and Katherine is white.

She kept doing so after being told about the fallacy of the claim.
It’s not until the truth is published that her tone start changing.
Then she raised totally different issues.

That didn’t left not many amicable options to deal with this kind.

Guess she knew all along that the claim were false. She just didn’t
expect anyone would publish the contrary. She’s a time bomb. She had
gone the extra miles condemning a person for a few slight friendly
gesture, we’ll never know what she’ll do to anyone.

It seems that her other much related real motive is best explained by
her very own words:

“I do not like the way you ramp up your connections”

It’s quite unfortunate that the world is filled with envy vermins that
just get this thing against those more successful than them.

The truth is they’re simply uncompetitive. Hence, they craft lies and
prejudices against those who are. That’s why we have so many nonsenses
justifying prohibition against so many consensual acts.

Some have reasonable cases. Most can be appeased. But some, like the
beldam, should get the fuck out of the gene pool for good along with
all her kind for the sake of prosperity for all before they form
another Nazi party.

It’s very stupid trying to reason to such bigots for the same reason
we don’t reason or negotiate with mosquitoes and germs. We just get
rid them.

More effortlessly we should set one of the vermin as a sample to show
the rest their proper place. They hit, we hit harder; Those maggots
don’t deserver higher level of communication.

Currently our world is filled with unfair misery given to those who are
honestly successful. The mere acts of making honest money are
punishable by tax. Getting many chicks is also condemned. Yet, we have
to lock our doors in fear that someone will steal our properties
because governments protect thieves.

Unless those who run the fastest also hit the hardest, success will
then simply be a bridge to gas chamber.

Even if we let the worthless die and kill parasites, the market will
take care of everything anyway. Believing otherwise is practicing envy
bigotry.

Yet, capitalists, out of benevolence have given more and more to those
who oppress them. Only capitalists patiently give the other cheek and
repay hatred and genocide with aids and helps often to ungrateful angry
mobs.

When vermins like Katherine keeps being influential, it should be about
time all of us to stop playing nice. Keep doing otherwise means having
to realize that it’s really fear and not benevolent or mercy that
motivate us.

Long live freedom, competition, rationality, meritocracy, prosperity,
and proper alignment between individuals’ interests to productivity as
a whole. The world will be a better place if all of her kind went
extinct.

What do you think

Ha! Little joke, there.

But something like an erotic radio play comes to mind. Or, indeed, a written description. Strictly speaking, no visuals there at all; only description.

That said, I still wonder if a scene in which someone makes a saucy comment about another’s anatomy qualifies as a “sex scene” if no actual sex is being had. Seduction, maybe. Flirting, sure - and foreplay. But “sex scene?”